THE CASPEN VIEW

Who owns the chandelier once it leaves the workshop

The most revealing question you can ask a lighting supplier is not about their makers or their lead times. It is this: what happens on the day it arrives?

By James Kendall 17 August 20264 min read
Watercolour illustration of a chandelier resting in an open timber crate

The most revealing question you can ask a lighting supplier is not about their makers or their lead times. It is this: what happens on the day it arrives?

Most of the time the answer, once you strip the wording back, is that a lorry brings a crate to the nearest hard standing, somebody signs for it, and after that it is not the supplier's problem. There is a number to ring if something is wrong. The number is answered by a person who has never seen the piece.

I have spent my working life in this trade, in a family business that has been in lighting for forty-one years, and I think this is the point at which our industry is quietly at its worst.

Consider what is actually in the crate

A large decorative piece arrives dismantled, in several boxes, packed by people who know exactly what is in them. Glass elements are separated and wrapped individually. There is a fixing kit, and a drop that has been cut to a measurement someone took months earlier. On a made-to-order commission there is nothing else like it anywhere.

Now consider who receives it. On a live site, that is whoever happens to be near the gate. The crate goes into a room that is still being worked in. It gets moved twice. At some point in the following weeks an electrician who has never handled that model opens it, works out the assembly from a diagram in a language they do not read, and hangs several thousand pounds of hand-blown glass off a ceiling they have not checked the capacity of.

That is the standard process. It is not anybody's fault in particular, which is precisely the problem. Every party has behaved reasonably within their own scope, and the scope stops at the kerb.

The failure modes are boringly predictable

A crate is signed for unopened, because nobody on site has the time or the authority to inspect it properly. Six weeks later it is opened and an element is broken. Was it broken in transit, on site, or during the move from the hall to the drawing room? Nobody knows, and the paperwork says it was accepted in good condition.

Or the piece goes up and it is subtly wrong. An arm at an angle, a drop that leaves it forty millimetres low, glass elements assembled in an order that puts the two palest ones next to each other. Not a fault, just an installation done by somebody with no reference for what right looks like. The client sees it, cannot say why it bothers them, and lives with it.

Or, worst of all, it is hung from a ceiling that will not take it, and nobody finds out for two years.

Why made to order raises the stakes

All of this would be a manageable irritation if a replacement were a phone call away. It is not. A commissioned piece that arrives damaged is not an exchange. It is another lead time, and a room finished around a hole where the light should be.

That is the real argument for taking the handover seriously. When there is no shelf to go back to, the value of doing the last mile properly is not customer service. It is risk management, and on a project with a completion date it is worth considerably more than whatever it costs.

Where we have landed

Our pieces are made to order at the maker, and in almost every case they come in to us before they go anywhere near a client. Somebody who knows what the piece is supposed to look like opens the crate, on a bench, with time and proper light. If something has moved in transit we find out then, in our building, rather than in a client's hallway.

Then we deliver it. And we can install it.

That second sentence is the one that matters, and it is the reason I keep writing this down. We are not handing a crate to a main contractor and hoping. We can put the piece up, in the room it was chosen for, with people who have handled it before and who know what it should look like when it is right.

I am aware how unglamorous that sounds next to a workshop in Veneto. It is still the part of the process where most of the disappointment in this industry is generated, and it is the part almost nobody will commit to in writing.

What this means if you are specifying

Ask the question early and ask it plainly. Who opens the crate. Who carries the piece into the room. Who hangs it. Who has checked what the ceiling will hold. Who comes back if it is not right.

If the answers are all 'the contractor' then the specification is being handed to the party with the least knowledge of the piece and the most pressure on their programme. That is not a criticism of contractors, most of whom are perfectly good at the fifty other things they are doing that week. It is an observation about where responsibility should sit.

And if a supplier cannot answer the question at all, that tells you what their involvement really ends at.

The position

A supplier should own the piece until it is on the ceiling and working. Not until it is despatched, not until it is signed for, not until the invoice clears. Until it is up, lit, and looks the way it looked in the drawing.

That is a harder promise to make than 'free delivery', which is why so few people make it. I think it is the only one worth making.

If you are working on a project where the lighting has to arrive properly and go up properly, that is a conversation we are glad to have at the start rather than the end. Start a conversation.

James Kendall

The best lighting thinking, direct to your inbox. For designers and collectors.